California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Bellante v. The Superior Court Of Kern County, No. KM019112A, NO. S-1500-AP-721 (Cal. App. 2010):
"Pursuant to Barker v. Wingo[, supra,] 407 U.S. 514, 530 [92 S.Ct. 2182, 2192, 33 L.Ed.2d 101], the presumptively prejudicial length of delay operates as a 'triggering mechanism' which necessitates inquiry into other factors. All of the factors must be balanced in order to determine whether or not there was a violation of respondent's federal right to a speedy trial. In addition to the length of the delay, the other factors which must be weighed by the trial court are: (1) the reason for the delay; (2) the defendant's assertion of his right to a speedy trial; and (3) actual prejudice to the defendant. (Ibid.) The foregoing factors are related and must be
Page 6
considered together with such other circumstances as may be relevant. {Id. at p. 533 [92 S.Ct. at p. 2193].)"
{People v. Alvarado, supra, 60 Cal.App.4th at p. Supp. 4.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.