California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Novela, F073275 (Cal. App. 2019):
offense must share common features that are sufficiently distinctive so as to support the inference that the same person committed both acts. [Citation.] 'The pattern and characteristics of the crimes must be so unusual and distinctive as to be like a signature.' [Citation.]" (Ibid.) Similarity of offenses is not required to establish the motive theory of relevance. (People v. Thompson (2016) 1 Cal.5th 1043, 1115.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.