California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Asay, 224 Cal.App.3d 608, 273 Cal.Rptr. 737 (Cal. App. 1990):
3 The court also states: "We have concluded that without proper safeguards the process of in-custody interrogation of persons suspected or accused of crime contains inherently compelling pressures which work to undermine the individual's will to resist and to compel him to speak where he would not otherwise do so freely." (Miranda v. State of Arizona, supra, 384 U.S. 436, 467, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 1624.) Under earlier cases, confessions obtained without a valid waiver of Miranda rights were deemed to have been coerced. (People v. Murtishaw (1981) 29 Cal.3d 733, 753, 175 Cal.Rptr. 738, 631 P.2d 446.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.