What is the test for a motion to suppress statements made by police during interviews?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Bridgeford, 194 Cal.Rptr.3d 336, 241 Cal.App.4th 887 (Cal. App. 2015):
Before trial, the trial court denied appellant's motion to suppress statements he made to law enforcement during two separate interviews. The first interview ended when appellant invoked his right to counsel under Miranda v. Arizona(1966) 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694(Miranda).
[241 Cal.App.4th 890]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts treated a motion to suppress statements made by appellant to the police during his detention and interrogation at the police station? (California, United States of America)
Does a lack of training in a police interview result in the suppression of a defendant's interview statements? (California, United States of America)
On appeal from a ruling on a suppression motion, what is the effect of the finding on the suppression motion? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion to suppress certain incriminatory statements taken by the police from petitioner allegedly in violation of his Miranda rights denied? (California, United States of America)
When the interview is recorded, when the facts surrounding the interview are undisputed, and when the interview takes place, what is the test for determining whether a statement is involuntary? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion to suppress evidence of a videotaped interview with the police? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion to suppress evidence of a videotaped interview with the police? (California, United States of America)
How have we obtained the transcript of an interview with the police in connection with a motion to suppress? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a denial of suppression motion, what is the effect of the finding of reasonableness of the officer's conduct in denying suppression motion? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of a motion to suppress postarrest statements made in response to questions from a police officer? (California, United States of America)
