What is the standard of review for a preliminary injunction?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. LM Connexions, Inc., A151812 (Cal. App. 2019):
Familiar principles govern the issuance of a preliminary injunction and the standard of review upon the appeal of one. A court must weigh two factors when deciding whether to issue a preliminary injunction: (1) the likelihood the moving party will prevail on the merits; and (2) the interim harm to both parties resulting from the issuance or non-issuance of the preliminary injunction. (Butt v. State of California
Page 5
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion to review a decision of a trial court? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, what is the standard of review in the context of a motion for summary review of the facts of the case? (California, United States of America)
Does this court have jurisdiction to review or overturn a preliminary injunction issued by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How does the abuse of review standard of review apply? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for reviewing the denial of a motion to dissolve an injunction? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant's request for reappointment of counsel for a preliminary hearing was rejected immediately before the preliminary hearing commenced, is such error harmless even under the beyond-the-reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the applicable standard of review for an application of the independent review test? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for reviewing state law errors at the guilt phase of a trial? (California, United States of America)
When a bench officer issued an order for a fee under review was not the same bench officer as the judge who presided over the trial, can the court exercise a less deferential standard of review? (California, United States of America)
