California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Wolfgang, 193 Cal.Rptr.3d 256, 240 Cal.App.4th 1268 (Cal. App. 2015):
4 Our high court recognized no distinction between parolees and probationers in People v. Ramos (2004) 34 Cal.4th 494, 505, fn. 3, 21 Cal.Rptr.3d 575, 101 P.3d 478. The court applied Sanders ' advance knowledge requirement to a probation search, but rejected the defendant's Fourth Amendment claim because officers conducting the search were aware the defendant was on probation and subject to a search condition.
4 Our high court recognized no distinction between parolees and probationers in People v. Ramos (2004) 34 Cal.4th 494, 505, fn. 3, 21 Cal.Rptr.3d 575, 101 P.3d 478. The court applied Sanders ' advance knowledge requirement to a probation search, but rejected the defendant's Fourth Amendment claim because officers conducting the search were aware the defendant was on probation and subject to a search condition.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.