What is the burden of proving consent in a sexual assault case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Barouh v. Haberman, 26 Cal.App.4th 40, 31 Cal.Rptr.2d 259 (Cal. App. 1994):

6 The burden is on plaintiff to prove lack of consent. (Use note and com. to BAJI No. 7.50 (1992 rev.), citing Kritzer v. Citron (1950) 101 Cal.App.2d 33, 39-40, 224 P.2d 808.) Here, however, defendant's trial counsel during discussion of instructions volunteered to assume the burden of proving consent. The instructions given and the special verdict form treated consent as an affirmative defense.

Other Questions


In a sexual assault case, what is the burden of proving that the court erred when it ruled in limine that evidence that he had committed sexual battery against two adult women by touching their buttocks against their will was admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving sexual intent against a prosecutor in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law regarding allegations of sexual assault made against appellant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
When a photograph of a defendant in a sexual assault case was found to have been taken in the context of an alleged sexual assault, is there any connection to the subsequent verdict of attempted sodomy? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving substantial evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt against a defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt against a defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting prior sexual assault evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.