What is the argument that section 4532(a) of the California Criminal Code does not constitute two separate offences?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Lozano, 192 Cal.App.3d 618, 237 Cal.Rptr. 612 (Cal. App. 1987):
The Attorney General relies on People v. Lopez (1971) 6 Cal.3d 45, 98 Cal.Rptr. 44, 489 P.2d 1372 and People v. Davis (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 760, 212 Cal.Rptr. 673, for the proposition that section 4532(a) does not establish two separate offenses.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does Section 654 of the California Criminal Code require a separate punishment for a criminal offence that violated more than one statute but nevertheless constituted an indivisible transaction? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by multiple convictions for multiple offences punishable by the same criminal offence against the same defendant concurrent with one criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
Does section 27 of the California Criminal Code, section 778a, subdivision (a)(1) of the Criminal Code of California apply to a defendant who is charged with a charge of conspiracy to commit a crime committed outside of the state? (California, United States of America)
Is section 28, subdivision (d) of the California Constitution harmonized with section I, article I, section 15 of the constitution with respect to self-incrimination? (California, United States of America)
Is Section 654 of the California Criminal Code applicable to a defendant who has committed a criminal offence under section 654 (1) of the Act 654, 654? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 654 of the California Criminal Code on a driver convicted of two separate criminal offences? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of using section 654 rather than section 667.6 of the California Criminal Code when rejecting a defendant's claim that three criminal offences arose from the same incident? (California, United States of America)
Does section 667 of the California Criminal Code prohibit the District Attorney from invoking section 654 of the Criminal Code to strike a prior conviction enhancement under Section 667? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by section 654 (a) of the Criminal Code of Ontario's Criminal Code punishable by Section 654, subdivision (a), punishable by the same law, punishable by a different law? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a criminal offence under section 654 of the California Criminal Code when it comes to punishment for two separate crimes? (California, United States of America)
