What is a trial court's duty to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Estrada, E057454 (Cal. App. 2013):

A trial court must instruct the jury on the general principles of law that are "closely and openly connected with the facts before the court." (People v. Wickersham (1982) 32 Cal.3d 307, 323, disapproved on other grounds in People v. Barton (1995) 12 Cal.4th 186, 200-201.) This obligation extends to lesser included offenses if the evidence "'raises a question as to whether all of the elements of the charged offense are present and there is evidence that would justify a conviction of such a lesser offense.' [Citations.]" (People v. Lopez (1998) 19 Cal.4th 282, 287.) Voluntary manslaughter is a lesser-included offense of murder. (People v. Booker (2011) 51 Cal.4th 141, 181.) However, as the trial court decided, the evidence in this case did not justify the giving of an instruction on voluntary manslaughter based on heat of passion or provocation or imperfect self-defense. A court's duty to instruct on lesser included offenses arises only

Page 14

Other Questions


Does the Court of Appeal err in refusing an instruction from the trial court on the lesser offense of attempted voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that the trial court erroneously refused to instruct on voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant's objection to giving instructions on voluntary manslaughter preclude a finding of error in the trial court's failure to do so? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court err when it did not instruct the jury on a provocation theory of voluntary manslaughter or second degree murder? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the trial court instruct the jury on a lesser included charge of voluntary manslaughter rather than murder? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have a duty to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter and attempted voluntary manslaughter as lesser included offenses of murder and attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.