What are the grounds for objection to evidence in a criminal case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Marsh, E064447 (Cal. App. 2017):

Defendant did not raise any of these objections in the trial court. In order to preserve an evidentiary objection on appeal, however, a party must make a timely objection in the trial court "so stated as to make clear the specific ground of the objection or motion." (Evid. Code, 353.) The purpose of this rule is to give the trial court a concrete legal proposition to pass on, to give the opponent an opportunity to cure the defect, and to prevent abuse. (People v. Partida (2005) 37 Cal.4th 428, 434.) Consequently, in the absence of such an objection, the ground for objection is not cognizable on appeal. (Id. at pp. 433-434.) Accordingly, as defendant anticipated, we deem these grounds for objection to the evidence forfeited for appellate review. We address, instead, defendant's contention that his trial attorney provided constitutionally deficient representation by failing to object to the admission of evidence of defendant's gang membership on the grounds he now asserts.

Page 14

We may reject an ineffective assistance of counsel claim if we find that the defendant has failed to meet his or her burden of demonstrating prejudice. (Strickland v. Washington (1984) 466 U.S. 668, 695-696.) In this context, prejudice means that there is a reasonable probability of a more favorable outcome in the absence of counsel's alleged error. (Id. at p. 694.) Here, despite the prosecutor's argument that defendant was shown to be a violent gang member who had armed himself in anticipation of the confrontation, the jury acquitted him of both first and second degree murder, convicting him instead of voluntary manslaughter, and deadlocking on the charge of premeditated attempted murder. This strongly suggests that defendant's character for violence, whether it was proven through his admission of gang membership or his carjacking conviction, was not a factor in the jury's analysis of the evidence. Accordingly, we are not persuaded that the jury would have acquitted him in the absence of the gang evidence.

Other Questions


What is the test for admissible evidence in a criminal case where an expert testified that there was no evidence of criminal wrongdoing? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant have any grounds of objection to the instruction in his personal injury case where he objected to the reference in the instruction to evidence of threats? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes substantial evidence of criminal intent in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the substantial evidence standard for claims of insufficiency of evidence in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant has committed multiple criminal objectives in pursuit of different criminal objectives, can he be punished for each of them? (California, United States of America)
Is evidence of a person's character or trait of his or her character in a civil case admissible in the context of a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
When will a jury find counsel incompetent in failing to oppose the admission of evidence in a criminal case on chain of custody grounds? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for prejudicial evidence in the context of evidence of racial motivation in criminal cases? (California, United States of America)
In a criminal case, is there any case law in which a jury has been ordered to conduct cross-examination of evidence in the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
In a criminal case, is there any case law in which a jury has been ordered to conduct cross-examination of evidence in the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.