What is the inconsistency between the Charter and the statute under examination?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. S.F., 1997 CanLII 12443 (ON SC):
It is argued that the inconsistency between the Charter and the statute under examination “can be defined as what is left out of the verbal formula as well as what is wrongly included”: Schachter v. Canada, 1992 CanLII 74 (SCC), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 679 at 699, 93 D.L.R. (4th) 1, per Lamer C.J.C.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Under what circumstances will an employer be required to cross-examine a witness in cross-examination? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the timetable for the hearing of a motion for cross examinations, cross examinations and factsums? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the enlarging statute of limitation after a cause of action has already been extinguished by the statute previously in force have any effect? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted s. 7 of the Charter of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be awarded damages for false arrest, wrongful imprisonment, Charter violation and Charter violation? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for justifying the limitation of Charter right to prove that a party has met the Charter's requirements on a balance of probabilities? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an expert be cross-examined on an inconsistency between their viva voce and their written report? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Minister of Justice have a basis to refuse surrender to surrender on the grounds that extradition to the United States is a violation of section 6(1) of the Charter of Charter Rights? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the consequence of a failure to cross-examine the complainant in cross-examination? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a deponent be cross-examined in the examination for discovery of a party who was unavailable at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
