There is no longer a presumption that the testimony of children is always less reliable than that of adults, and that corroboration is required: R. v. W.(R.), 1992 CanLII 56 (SCC), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 122, at para. 24. W.R. also notes that it could be wrong to apply adult tests for credibility to the evidence of children: para. 25. The standard which would be applied to an adult's evidence is not always appropriate in assessing the credibility of young children: R v. F. (C.C.), 1997 CanLII 306 (SCC), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1183, at para. 48. However, in W.(R.) McLachlin J. further stated:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.