What is the legal test for issuing a jury notice when the trial has been adjourned?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Seysener (Guardian of) v. Gelpke, 1999 CanLII 6077 (BC SC):
It is clear that from the decision in Hoare v. Firestone that there is no automatic right to issue a jury notice when a trial has been adjourned from the original trial date, but there are some circumstances when the court may grant an extension of time for that purpose.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a single issue is proposed for summary trial by way of summary trial, does the court have any consideration in deciding the issue as a whole? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for bringing a jury trial after the expiry of a notice of trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for adjourning a trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BCSC treated the issue of procedural issues at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
How to re-frame common issue (h) such that it would be appropriate for a common issues trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff bring an application for an adjournment, mid trial, despite previous rulings denying adjournments? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for adjournment of a trial by application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a common issue or issue be tried in advance of individual issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for adjournment of a trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
