The case of Kelly v. Watson, 1921 CanLII 23 (SCC), 61 S.C.R. 482, [1921] 1 W.W.R. 958, 57 D.L.R. 363, is authority for the proposition that if a court after hearing the evidence can spell out an agreement which represents the true intention of the parties it should do so. However, where the true intention of the parties is vague and the terms of the agreement are not clear, then the court cannot formulate an agreement between the parties who were never ad idem to that agreement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.