With respect to benefits, a plaintiff must show on the evidence that they have suffered an out of pocket loss during the notice period. If a plaintiff fails to show that she has paid out or lost money by reason of the absence of fringe benefits, her claim cannot succeed: Wilks v. Moore Dry Kiln Co. of Canada, 32 B.C.L.R. 149, 1981 CanLII 597 (S.C.); Albert v. Conseil Scolaire Francophone de la Colombie- Britannique, 2006 BCSC 1539, aff’d 2009 BCCA 19.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.