In Coffey v. Van Der Horn, [1994] 4 E.T.R. (2d) 50 at 57, the court referred to Halsbury Laws of England, 4th ed., VOL 50 (1984), para. 377, pp. 218-219 and the proposition that it is a matter of discretion for the court whether it should answer questions arising on a contingency which has not yet happened. Normally, the court will not do so unless some good cause is shown.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.