Is service of a writ of summons and statement of demand sufficient to constitute notice in writing?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from L. v. L., 1943 CanLII 209 (SK QB):
In Gale v. Powley, supra, the accepted view seems to be that under this section notice in writing is a condition precedent to the right to commence proceedings. No argument is suggested that service of the writ of summons and statement of claim or demand would constitute sufficient notice in writing.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What constitutes sufficient particulars in a notice of intention to amend a teacher's contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is objection No. 7 of the Applicant’s Notice of Motion a good service of service? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is a reasonable excuse can be established in a notice notice application if someone is temporarily incapable of attending to his affairs or giving instructions during the notice period? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is sufficient compliance with the Rules of Civil Procedure to be considered sufficient compliance? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is service of a garnishee summons binding any debt due or accruing due? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for giving a written notice of notice of intent to commence an action against an individual? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a demand, proven to have been made, constitute an essential element in a claim for interest? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the phrase "appear in person" include the ordinary entry of appearance after service of a writ of summons? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the words "gift" and "garnishment" in clause 3 of the Statement of Claimant's Notice of Claim to the Court of Appeal been interpreted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is sufficient evidence sufficient to support a verdict? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
