California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Fabris, 31 Cal.App.4th 685, 37 Cal.Rptr.2d 667 (Cal. App. 1995):
The opinion is criticized in People v. Glover (1991) 233 Cal.App.3d 1476, 1479, 285 Cal.Rptr. 362, People v. Lopez (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 1840, 1844-1846, 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 317, and People v. Fry (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 1334, 1338-1339, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 43, as departing from precedent in holding that arson is a specific intent crime. The criticism is misinformed. 4 Stonewall F. does not characterize arson as a specific intent crime and expressly eschews resolution of the issue. (See 208 Cal.App.3d at p. 1064, fn. 8, 256 Cal.Rptr. 578.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.