Is a witness's testimony admissible?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Afont v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., B260719 (Cal. App. 2016):
People v. Townsel (2016) 63 Cal.4th 25, 52); or (3) that the content of the documents is admissible because the documents contain multiple layers of hearsay, and "[m]ultiple hearsay may not be admitted unless there is an exception for each level" (People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665, 675).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a witness's testimony from an earlier proceeding admissible under the prior testimony exception to the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will transcripts of testimony be admissible in lieu of personal testimony? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible testimony at a civil trial of a witness giving evidence in a testimony that was not in the context of the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the admission of testimonial hearsay against a criminal defendant violate the Sixth Amendment right to cross-examine witnesses? (California, United States of America)
Is a statement by a witness that is inconsistent with his trial testimony admissible? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's testimony in a civil trial admissible? (California, United States of America)
Can testimony of an ordinary witness who claims to have heard the confession or damaging admission of a criminal defendant be excluded from evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a juror's sworn declaration that she would like to re-read a witness's testimony admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a challenge to the admission of expert testimony for an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is an attempt by a third party to suppress testimony admissible against a defendant? (California, United States of America)
