California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Cohen v. Myers, 22 Cal.App.4th 1701, 28 Cal.Rptr.2d 96 (Cal. App. 1994):
In Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 256, 37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168, the court further made clear that retail dealers as well as manufacturers were strictly liable. "Retailers like manufacturers are engaged in the business of distributing goods to the public. They are an integral part of the overall producing and marketing enterprise that should bear the cost of injuries resulting from defective products.... Strict liability on the manufacturer and retailer alike affords maximum protection to the injured plaintiff and works no injustice to the defendants, for they can adjust the costs of such protection between them in the course of their continuing relationship." (Id. at pp. 262-263, 37 Cal.Rptr. 896, 391 P.2d 168. Emphasis added.)
Page 106
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.