California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Sixth Appellate Dist. v. Scott, H033759, No. SS072417 (Cal. App. 2011):
In view of the ineffective assistance of counsel claim, we are persuaded that we should exercise our discretion to reach the constitutional issue. However, in light of our conclusion that the court did not abuse its discretion when it excluded the inadmissible, irrelevant third party evidence, we reject defendant's claim that the exclusion of this evidence violated his due process rights. (See People v. Lewis, supra, 26 Cal.4th at pp. 372-373.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.