The onus is on the defendants to prove that a reasonable patient, having all the information at hand that the plaintiff possessed, ought reasonably to have followed the recommended course of treatment. Next, the extent, if any, by which the treatment would have been reduced by the treatment must be considered (Gregory v. ICBC, 2011 BCCA 144, 17 B.C.L.R. (5th) 101).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.