How have courts interpreted the modified rule in sex crime cases?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Maldonado, B278458 (Cal. App. 2017):
and punished for every act." (People v. Scott (1994) 9 Cal.4th 331, 347.) The modified rule in sex crime cases ensures that a defendant receives a punishment proportionate to his culpability. (People v. Harrison (1989) 48 Cal.3d 321, 335.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How has section 654 of the California Criminal Code been interpreted by courts in cases involving multiple sex crimes? (California, United States of America)
How have the voir dire questions in a criminal case been interpreted by the trial court and the prosecutor in this case? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 186.22.22 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant and an aider and abettor of the crime are accused of the same crime? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the rules of evidence in cases dealing with self-confessed statements made outside of court? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted other-crimes evidence in a trial where a defendant admitted that he had committed a crime against a witness? (California, United States of America)
Does the court have any case law with respect to the interpretation of the law in the context of personal injury cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted statutory references to the Penal Code in cases involving sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
