How have courts interpreted section 583 of the California Statutory Limitations Act?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Preston v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, 126 Cal.App.3d 402, 178 Cal.Rptr. 882 (Cal. App. 1981):
Finally in Stella v. Great Western Sav. & Loan Assn., supra, 13 Cal.App.3d at page 741, 91 Cal.Rptr. 771, we stated "It would seem that the court's mandate to follow the guidance of section 583 in its entirety and the need for uniformity of application is best served by equating the section with statutes of limitation.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How has the California Supreme Court interpreted statutory interpretation in the context of the California Family Law Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 213.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure in the context of statutory interpretation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 364 of the California Statutory Limitations Act? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1018 of the California Criminal Code when a defendant makes a statement in open court that authorizes or adopts a motion to withdraw his plea? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of section 28 of the California Constitution when it comes to the exclusion or limitation of prior felony convictions for impeachment? (California, United States of America)
Does section 802 of the California Statutory Limitation Act, section 802, apply to a defendant who is in prison in another jurisdiction? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1950.5(f) of the California Statutory Guidelines for the purpose of recovering security deposits from a recalcitrant landlord? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Supreme Court have any power or authority to interpret a section of the California Penal Code that is ambiguous and ambiguous? (California, United States of America)
How has section 69894.1 of the California Constitution been interpreted and interpreted by the courts? (California, United States of America)
