How have courts dealt with the issue of false confessions at trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Asay, 224 Cal.App.3d 608, 273 Cal.Rptr. 737 (Cal. App. 1990):

In Milton, several confessions were introduced at trial. One of the confessions was obtained by an undercover police officer who was placed in a cell with defendant. The court held that any error in the admission of the confession was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence of guilt was overwhelming, and the previous, properly admitted confessions left no doubt that the jury would have reached the same verdict without hearing the challenged confession. (Milton v. Wainwright, supra 407 U.S. 371, 92 S.Ct. 2174.)

Other Questions


When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
If there is evidence that coercive interrogation tactics were used to elicit a confession or witness statement, can the trial court exclude or limit the scope of expert testimony about coerced and false confessions? (California, United States of America)
In a motion for a new trial, is the trial court bound by the same principles as the court of appeal? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court treat a claim by a defendant that an issue raised and decided in the trial court resulted in constitutional violations? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with errors and misconduct committed by the trial court and the prosecutor? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How has the Court of Appeal in Ontario dealt with appellant's claim that he was prejudiced by the error-strewn trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the duty of a trial court to instruct a jury on the general principles of law relevant to the issues raised by the trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who failed to object to the trial court's decision to conduct voir dire in open court preserve the issue for appeal? (California, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with the issue of good faith showing in a motion where a witness has absconded from court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.