How has the evidence code been reviewed for abuse of discretion?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Reyes, H036867 (Cal. App. 2013):

"A trial court's determination of whether evidence is admissible under [Evidence Code] section 356 is reviewed for abuse of discretion." (People v. Parrish (2007) 152 Cal.App.4th 263, 274 (Parrish).)

Other Questions


When will a court not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence under Evidence Code section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the question of whether the evidence was properly admitted under the California Evidence Code section 352 need to be reviewed for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have discretion to admit evidence of abuse of power or abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is a court's ruling admitting evidence of other crimes reviewable for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Are evidentiary rulings reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard of review? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in the context of hearsay or abuse of discretion on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's decision to admit or exclude evidence reviewable for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion concerning the admissibility of evidence subject to review for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is a court's ruling excluding third party culpability evidence reviewed for an abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of abuse of the abuse of evidence for the purpose of motive and consciousness of guilt? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.