How has the court interpreted "e.g. notice of action" in determining whether to extend the appearance period?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. N. River Ins. Co., 18 Cal.App.5th 863, 227 Cal.Rptr.3d 243 (Cal. App. 2017):
People v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins. Co. (2010) 49 Cal.4th 301, 313, 110 Cal.Rptr.3d 4, 231 P.3d 909 ) and with its recognition that "[e]xtending the appearance period adds to the administrative burden on the court ...." ( People v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc. , supra , 2 Cal.5th at p. 48, 211 Cal.Rptr.3d 79, 384 P.3d 1226 ).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered the impact of a related action in determining whether to bring an action to trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted the two-step test in determining whether a defendant had a "break in the action"? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
Does a juvenile court hearing determine whether a minor should be tried as an adult prior to a determination that the minor's guilt should be determined? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 19996.2(a) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure when determining whether an employee has been on an unauthorized leave for a period of time? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted section 1016.5 of the California Immigration Code and how have the courts interpreted the word 'court' in that section? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted jury instructions in determining whether a razor blade is a deadly weapon under section 4574 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the role of a county sheriff in determining whether a sheriff is a county official? (California, United States of America)
