How has section 654 of the Criminal Code been interpreted in the context of a burglary?

In this case, the trial court applied an erroneous test, holding that section 654 was not applicable because the burglary in count 1 was "completed" at the time of entry. There is no question but that a burglary is completed upon entry with felonious intent. (People v. Escobar (1992) 7 Cal.App.4th 1430, 1437.) However, the question in section 654 analysis is different: it is whether the crimes were incident to a single objective, not whether one crime was "completed" before the other was committed.

Page 32