How do courts determine who the parties to an action are?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Sinclair v. Katakis, F060497 (Cal. App. 2013):

To determine who the parties to an action are, courts consider the allegations of the complaint. (Plumlee v. Poag (1984) 150 Cal.App.3d 541, 547.) As set forth above, all appellants alleged every cause of action against every respondent. After trial, respondents provided the court with a detailed chart setting forth the parties to the litigation, the allegations to enforce the governing documents and those to enforce the contractual obligations, and the claims appellants asserted in their posttrial briefs. The allegations and evidence supported the conclusion that all appellants made claims to enforce the governing documents of the homeowners association.

Other Questions


In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its factual determination for that factual determination? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a party is liable for actions committed against other parties? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a party to a motor vehicle accident can be held liable for injuries sustained as a result of the intervening actions of a third party? (California, United States of America)
Is a party who transfers his interest in an action after the action has been commenced and before judgment the proper party to appeal? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered the impact of a related action in determining whether to bring an action to trial? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a juvenile court hearing determine whether a minor should be tried as an adult prior to a determination that the minor's guilt should be determined? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.