Is a tenancy implied from the evidence upon the terms mentioned in the attornment?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Hobbs v. Ontario Loan and Debenture Co., 1889 CanLII 10 (ON CA):
A tenancy from year to year may be implied from the evidence upon the terms mentioned in the attornment, and that would be enough to support the plaintiffs’ case. See Gibboney v. Gibboney, 36 U.C.R. 236, and cases there cited.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a variation in terms of an order that would have changed the terms of a long-term disability order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the word "similar fact evidence" in a motion where the evidence is not the same fact evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts in B.C. dealt with the issue of long term fixed-term employment contracts? (Ontario, Canada)
What impact would the inclusion of the evidence in the context of section 24(2) of the Charter under which the evidence is excluded? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a court imply a term in the nature of a non-competition clause? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the term "joint tenancy" apply to the issue of severance? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law in which the Court has rejected evidence tendered in affidavit form as other affidavit evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the implied term in a contract where a party is ordered to return a sample to the seller? (Ontario, Canada)
In determining whether an employer has led sufficient evidence to give rise to a practical evidentiary burden, what is the test for this type of evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the principals of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to evidence that contradicts the evidence given by the complainants in their cross-examinations? (Ontario, Canada)
