The authority which most supports the plaintiff is Dixon v. British Columbia Transit (1995), 9 B.C.L.R. (3d) 108 (S.C.). In that case, the trial judge found that Transit had committed the tort of deceit in misrepresenting to Dixon that it had cause when it knew it did not. Here I have concluded Swaneset did not have cause, but it has not been shown that Fukui knew Swaneset did not have cause.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.