California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Vergara v. Loeb, B286252 (Cal. App. 2019):
It was unnecessary for the majority to determine whether Loeb could meet the first prong of the anti-SLAPP analysis, that is, establish a prima facie case that his alleged actions fell into one of the categories listed in section 425.16, subdivision (e). (Flatley v. Mauro (2006) 39 Cal.4th 299, 314.) But in reversing the trial court's denial of the motion, I would necessarily consider whether Loeb satisfied the first prong.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.