Does the association theory need to be addressed in this case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Jaimes, 274 Cal.Rptr.3d 222 (Cal. App. 2021):
12 Because the evidence is sufficient to prove the association theory, we need not address the benefit theory in this case. (See People v. Guiton (1993) 4 Cal.4th 1116, 1128-1129, 17 Cal.Rptr.2d 365, 847 P.2d 45 ; People v. Ghobrial (2018) 5 Cal.5th 250, 278, 234 Cal.Rptr.3d 669, 420 P.3d 179.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would change the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would change the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
