Does a defendant have a constitutional right to appoint an expert at trial?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Anguiano, F062011 (Cal. App. 2013):
30. While a criminal defendant may have the right to the appointment of an expert, as part of the right to effective assistance of counsel, a defendant does not have a federal Constitutional right to the effective assistance of an expert or any other witness. (People v. Samayoa (1997) 15 Cal.4th 795, 838.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
What waiver of appeal rights apply to a criminal defendant who knowingly waives any significant right such as constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a constitutional right to appoint an expert to the defence of their case? (California, United States of America)
If defendant has no right to present the evidence at trial, has he not established a violation of his right to a fair trial? (California, United States of America)
Under what circumstances will a federal criminal defendant be denied his right to exercise his constitutional right to a jury trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because the trial court relieved the prosecution of its burden of establishing that defendant acted with malice? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant's voluntary absence operate to waive his constitutional right to be present at trial and permitted continuation of the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant's voluntary absence operate to waive his constitutional right to be present at trial and permitted continuation of the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
