California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Liton Gen. Engineering Contractor, Inc. v. United Pacific Insurance, 16 Cal.App.4th 577, 20 Cal.Rptr.2d 200 (Cal. App. 1993):
Subcontractor's attempt to collect its attorney fees and costs incurred in arbitration in this action violates the rule that a surety cannot be liable for more than its principal, and constitutes a forbidden attempt to vary or vacate the arbitration award without any sufficiently compelling reason. (See Moncharsh v. Heily & Blase, supra, 3 Cal.4th at p. 10, 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 183, 832 P.2d 899.) The surety was immune [16 Cal.App.4th 610] from payment of subcontractor's arbitration fees under the present statutory scheme.
The applicable law wholly precludes the majority's result. I would reverse the judgment.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.