What is the primâ facie evidence of title as against Adam and those claiming under him?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Gray v. Richford, 1877 CanLII 6 (ON CA):
It is clearly settled by the series of cases following doe Hughes v. Dyeball, M. & M. 346, that this is primâ facie evidence of title as against Adam and those claiming under him.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a motion for a stay of execution pending a counter-claim, cross-claim and third party claim valid? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the word "similar fact evidence" in a motion where the evidence is not the same fact evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the evidence that supports Cesaltina's claim of mental distress in relation to her neighbours? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the fact that a tenant never raised the issue of their possessory claim until 1991 affect the validity of the claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's new statement of claim that describes the nature of their employment contract relevant to a whistleblowing claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a purchaser entitled to claim back the deposit on a contract where the vendor has not had a good title? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for rectification of a title under the Land Titles Act? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a medical malpractice claim negligence even in the absence of expert evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the principals of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to evidence that contradicts the evidence given by the complainants in their cross-examinations? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law in which the Court has rejected evidence tendered in affidavit form as other affidavit evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
